Isn't it quite curious that the first act of then President elect Barack Hussein Obama, the first Arab-American President, was to issue executive order 13489 banning release of ANY of his records. Never mind the Freedom of Information Act and everyone else! And why aren't liberals more interested in this inauspicious act?
Also curious is the fact that the media won't talk about the investigation the Sheriff is leading into the Presidents birth certificate which he has concluded is a possible forgery, or the fact that his posse has been denied access to the Presidents Selective Service records (you can't view them either..remember executive order 13489??). But they WILL talk about how the DOJ is suing the Sheriff over possible immigration issues..particularly the fact that he is enforcing laws that the Federal Government refuses to enforce! Thats news??
Anyone ELSE think that the media is not biased? Do you need MORE examples? There are many!!!
Anyway, back to the issue at hand, the presidential orders. Did you know that without Congressional approval, the President now has the power to transfer whole populations to any part of the country, the power to suspend the Press and to force a national registration of all persons? The President, in essence, has dictatorial powers never provided to him under the Constitution. The President has the power to suspend the Constitution and the Bill of Rights in a real or perceived emergency. Unlike Lincoln and Roosevelt, these powers are not derived from a wartime need, but from any crisis, domestic or foreign, hostile or economic. (Thank George Dubba-you for that suspend the constitutional executive order)
Liberals probably can justify each and every one of Obama's EO's as "necessary to the protection of the Republic", but why issue an order banning the release of ANY of his own records? And why don't liberals even care? What are your thoughts?