Just when liberals thought that this issue was finally put to rest with the 2011 release of his long form birth certificate.  But as reported by this blog there were many in the "tech" community that were not convinced of it's legitimacy and many videos were uploaded to YouTube explaining how the document was "constructed"as well as a maverick Sheriff out in Arizona names Joe Arpaio.

Michael Muskal writes on latimes.com that "Arizona's Sheriff Joe Arpaio says that volunteer investigators working for him have concluded that President Obama’s birth certificate is not legitimate.

The Maricopa County sheriff made his remarks Tuesday at a news conference, saying: “At the very least, I can tell you this, based on all of the evidence presented and investigated, I cannot in good faith report to you that these documents are authentic.”

He added: “My investigators believe that the long-form birth certificate was manufactured electronically and that it did not originate in a paper format as claimed by the White House.”

The latest pronouncements are a return to the issue for Arpaio, who is seeking reelection in November. Further, they come as the federal government is scheduled to begin Thursday its civil trial against Arpaio, accused of racially profiling Latinos.

That suit is part of a chain of federal civil rights litigation against Arpaio, who has made a career out of championing conservative issues, such as tough stands on law and order,  illegal immigration and, of late, the so-called birther issue."

The following video claims to show how the forgery was committed:

"Being a natural-born citizen is one of the constitutional requirements of the office of president and vice president. So repeatedly re-litigating the birther issue is still red meat for the more conservative elements of the Republican Party and those on the right flank outside the GOP, all of whom question Obama’s legitimacy to serve." Muskal wrote. However,  in addition to being "red meat" for conservatives and those on the right flank outside of the GOP questioning this, but maybe, just maybe there really IS something to this, and more scrutiny is needed.  Or do you disagree, and if so, why do you disagree?